The People's Republic of Mongolia was founded in 1924 and replaced
the constitutional monarchy (Siemers, 1995: 691). It had been a satellite of
the former USSR. In 1986, President J. Batmönh repeatedly announced the
implementation of a 'Mongolian Glasnost,' which appeared to be necessary given
the crumbling state of the USSR, Mongolia's most important trading partner at
the time. Another reason was the growing dissatisfaction among the people of
Mongolia with the government's economic policies. Moreover, the Mongolian
communist party conducted surveys on the people's attitude towards members of
parliament, which was published in the party organ Unen (lit. truth) in
1988. The report said that 62 percent of the interviewees were dissatisfied
with the performance of parliament members (Siemers, 1995: 693).
At the same time,
Michael Gorbachev made public his intention to withdraw soviet troops from
Mongolia. The first troops left the country in 1987, and by 1992 all military
installations and personnel had been removed from the country.
In 1989, students
and other intellectuals formed several political circles, discussing current
social and political problems. These groups did not meet regularly, nor did
they have a clear organizational structure (Barkmann, 2005). At the end of the
year, he first opposition party was founded, the Mongolian Democratic Union. In
early 1990, several other opposition parties, such as the Mongolian Democratic
Party (MDP), the Mongolian Green Party (MGP), the Mongolian National Progress
Party (MNPP), and the Mongolian Social-Democratic Party (MSDP) were
established. The opposition parties organized several large demonstrations with
some 40,000 people demanding free elections, referenda on important political
issues and the implementation of a market economy. The MPRP leadership finally
gave in, allowing political reforms.
The provisional
parliament consisted of two-chambers, with 430 members directly elected lower
house members, and fifty members indirectly elected members in the upper house.
The number of seats allocated to each party in the upper house had to be proportional
to the number of seats held by the party in the lower house.
The first free
multi-party election was held in July 1990. Even though the opposition won less
than twenty percent of seats, the election was a watershed in Mongolia's
political development. Competition was fairly tough with more than two thousand
candidates from six parties contesting 430 seats (Siemers, 1995: 694). Apart from the fact that the ruling party
mobilized the entire state apparatus in support of its candidates, the electoral
power of the opposition was also weakened by the disunity within the opposition
and the fact that the opposition had difficulties in finding promising
candidates in all of the 430 districts. A new electoral system and a more
united opposition seemed to be a solution.
In February 1992,
Mongolia's new constitution came into force. According to Article 21, the
parliament consists of one chamber and has 76 members. Citizens aged 25 or
older are eligible to run for office and citizens aged 18 or older may exercise
their right to vote. The term of office is four years. Moreover, a new election
law was passed. The law stipulated that the 76 members of parliament be elected
by plurality vote in 26 electoral districts with a district magnitude ranging
from two to four.
The first election
under the new law was held in June 1992. The new electoral system seemed
promising and the opposition was certain to win more seats this time. Parts of
the opposition learned from their failures in 1990 and formed coalitions. There
were two broad coalitions. The first (known as the Democratic Alliance, DA) consisted
oft he Mongolian Democratic Party, Mongolian Green Party and the Mongolian
National Party, and the second comprised the Democratic Party of Mongolian
Believers and the Mongolian People's Party (Barkmann, 2005). The opposition
camp was, however, still too fragmented as to oust the ruling MPRP, lacked
qualified candidates and could not enter strategic alliances. The ruling party
nominated one candidate in each of the 76 constituencies, whereas the DA could
only nominate 48 hopefuls and the MSDP only 28 candidates. Other opposition
parties fielded a total of 141 hopefuls. The applied Block Vote
worsened the chances of the opposition, leading to the landslide victory of the
MPRP (see Table 1). The MPRP captured 92.1 percent of the 76 seats at stake
with less than 60 percent of the votes cast. The DA gained 4 seats, the MSDP 1
and one independent the remaining seat. The result was widely considered to be
not merely unfair but dangerous to the nation-state's political development (Brick, Gastil, and Kimberling,
1992).
In January 1996,
parliament finally amended the election law, such that all the 76 members of parliament
are now elected by plurality vote in single seat constituencies.
On 30 June 1996, the
Democratic Alliance (DA) consisting of the Mongolian National Democratic Party
(MNDP) and the Mongolian Social Democratic Party (MSDP) ended the seventy-five
year parliamentary majority of the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party
(MPRP). The alliance captured 65.8 percent of the 76 seats at stake in the
Great State Hural, Mongolia's parliament (see Table 2). The MPRP lost 45 of the
70 seats the party had obtained in the previous election. The election was a
watershed event in Mongolia's short history of democracy. The new government
under Premier M. Enkhsaikhan carried out a number of highly unpopular measures
that, for instance, led to a drastic rise in energy prices. Moreover, service
fees and the prices for other daily necessities rose by about 40 percent.
Consequently, the DA lost popular support within a short time. The situation
worsened when the new government had to admit that it lacked qualified
personnel to replace the MPRP-loyal bureaucrats it had sacked at all levels of
administration.
At the end of the
1990s, the democratic camp was highly fragmented. Several new parties were
formed. In 2000, the DA suffered a further setback, when members of the MNDP
left the party to found the Party of Civil Courage, and former MSDP members
launched the Mongolian New Social Democratic Party. In the same year,
parliamentary elections were held. The MPRP nominated 76 candidates, that is
one in each of the 76 constituencies, and ran a highly focused campaign
targeting the younger groups of voters. The opposition, on the other hand, was
split into twelve parties and three party coalitions that altogether nominated
560 candidates. Unsurprisingly, the MPRP won a landslide victory in the
parliamentary election of 2 July 2000 (see Table 3). The party captured 72 out
of the 76 seats at stake, ousting the government of the DA. After the defeat,
five of the most influential opposition parties, being aware that they could
only win future elections by being united, decided to merge into the Democratic
Party.[i] Academic and political circles in Mongolia referred to the merger
as the second wave of democratization in nation’s history (Barkmann, 2005). The
opposition was optimistic about a victory in the presidential race the
following year. Notwithstanding, then incumbent President Natsagiyn Bagabandi
of the MPRP won the election with 57.9 percent of the vote. The DP nominated
former parliamentary speaker and MSDP chair Radnaasumbereliyn Gonchigdorj, who
garnered 36.6 percent. The third candidate in the presidential election of 20
May 2001, Lusvandamba Dashnyam of the Party of Civil Courage, obtained 3.6
percent. With this victory, the MPRP assumed control over all the most powerful
political institutions in Mongolia. However, the party was restrained in its
exercise of the full range of constitutional powers, winning praise from
international organizations, such as Freedom House (2004).
Mongolia's
transition to a market economy has been smooth compared with that of other
former communist countries. GDP growth, in
particular, has remained steady, with the country recovering within a few years
from the initial recession during the Transition (Cheng, 2003). Growth
increased from 1.1 percent in 2000 to over 5 percent in the election year; and
inflation has constantly decreased from 11.6 in 2000 to approximately 5 percent
four years later. During its term of office, the MPRP government succeeded in
lowering the unemployment rate from 4.7 to about 3.5 percent. Most importantly,
the MPRP government succeeded in convincing Russia to write off Mongolia’s debt
of US$ 11bn. Despite this economic progress, poverty remains a serious social
problem. According to recent estimates by the World Bank and the United Nations
Development Program, 36 percent of the population lives below the poverty line.[ii] Unsurprisingly, poverty and economic development were
the main issues addressed by the opposition and the ruling party during the
election campaign.
Electoral campaign
The election law stipulates that the
electoral campaign period ends twenty-four hours before polling day and begins
with the registration of the candidates. Candidates may register fifteen days
after the General Election Commission (GEC) officially announced the election.
The registration period lasts for twenty days. According to the election law,
the announcement has to be made not less than 65 days before polling day.
On 12 April 2004,
the GEC announced that national elections would be held on 27 June. The official
election campaign, thus, lasted between 49 and 29 days depending on the day of
registration. The election law stipulates that candidates nominated by
political parties and party coalitions as well as independents may register for
candidacy. Non-partisan hopefuls have to provide a list of at least 801
signatures from voters in his or her electoral district. Each candidate has to
pay a deposit of MNT 10,000 (around US$ 9) that will be returned to those
elected. Half of the deposit is returned to those achieving at least the
average vote share of all candidates in the district. In total, 244 candidates
registered with the GEC; all but 15 were nominated by the seven political
parties taking part in the election. The Party of Civil Courage, the DP and the
Motherland-Mongolian Democratic New Socialist Party agreed to form the
Motherland-Democracy Coalition (MDC). Apart from the MDC, only the ruling MPRP
nominated one candidate in each of the 76 single-seat constituencies. The
Republican Party (RP) contested 35 seats, the Mongolian Party of National Unity
(MPNU) put up a candidate in 23, while the Mongolian Conservative Unity Party
(MCUP), the Mongolian Green Party (MPG), and the Mongolian Liberal Party (MLP)
contested just a handful of seats each. The average number of candidates
contesting each constituency decreased from nine in 2000 to just three in 2004,
significantly increasing the chances of candidates from the main opposition
camp. On the average the candidates were 44 years old. Six out ten hopefuls
were in their forties and two out of ten in their fifties. There were a total
of 36 women contesting for office.[iii]
There are minor
restrictions on electoral activities. The election law does not specify the maximum
amount of money a candidate may spend during the campaign period, but candidates
must keep a record of their spending. Posters, flyers and other promotional
material may be distributed only at designated public places. The conduct and
publication of public opinion polls is illegal during the final week of
campaigning. According to the election law, the GEC may arrange for free
airtime on public television and radio for airing political advertisements.
This time, each party received twice a time frame of 20 minutes per week. Aside
from these broadcasts, candidates, political parties, and party coalitions may
place advertisements on television and radio at their own expense. There is a
large variety of newspapers representing both opposition and government views
available to Mongolian voters. About 70 percent of households are equipped with
a television set. There is one nationwide television station run by the
government, seven independent regional stations, and another local one
controlled by the city government of Ulaanbaatar. State-owned radio broadcasts
throughout the country and still is a major source of information in the
countryside. There is one independent radio station broadcasting almost
nationwide and an increasing number of small local FM stations. The government
does not censor the Internet, but only about 5.6 percent of the population has
access to it. The Internet is of no importance in Mongolian electoral
campaigns. Legislation in 1998 bans the censorship of public information and
requires the privatization of the media industry. The government has, however,
delayed the implementation of this provision. Although the number of
independent media outlets has increased significantly over the years, the
government indirectly controls these media outlets by filing libel suits and
launching tax audits in the wake of critical articles. Journalists, thus,
practice self-censorship.[iv] Moreover, severe financial difficulties make journalists and media
outlets susceptible to financial inducements. For instance, it is common
practice for media outlets to accept financial assistance from politicians in
exchange for news coverage. In this context, it is unsurprising that the broadcast
media tended to help the government's cause during the 2004 campaign. Opposition
candidates were reportedly less successful in obtaining special media coverage;
in particular, there were complains that state-run television only accepted
payments from MPRP candidates.[v] According to a survey (Mongolian Open Society Foundation, 2004), 74 percent of the observed election
television coverage favored MPRP candidates; so did 80 percent of radio
broadcasts (see Figure 1). Mongolia's print media was less biased. Two out of
ten news stories were impartial, almost every third was supportive of the MDC,
but still more than half were in favor of the MPRP (see Figure 2).
The dominance of the
MPRP becomes even more evident by looking at how voters got informed about the
election. About 91 percent of the electorate gained information about the
election from television programs, more than half from newspapers, 20 percent
from radio programs, and 16 percent from other sources, such as flyers,
posters, and billboards (Globe International, 2004). In addition, about 80
percent of the total airtime used for ads on radio (220 hours) and television
(470 hours), respectively, and 70 percent of the 100 m3 of newspaper
ads were claimed by the ruling MPRP. Another issue of concern was the illegal
use of state-owned infrastructure and public officials during the electoral
campaign period. More than 160 electoral campaign activities were held on
state-owned premises. In the majority of these cases, no rent was paid. A total
of 1,141 civil servants were actively involved in electoral campaigns working
more than 4,761 hours canvassing votes, and 854 state-owned vehicles were
counted at election rallies. The MPRP took full advantage of its incumbency.[vi]
A survey conducted
by Sant Maral in March 2004 revealed that the 49 percent would vote for
candidates of the MPRP, 29 percent for the MDC, and 15 percent for other
hopefuls. About 7 percent were undecided. Similar results were obtained by the
Mongolian Nationwide Voter Survey, which had been carried out a month later.[vii] These figures, along with knowing that the governing party would
mobilize the entire state apparatus (including its media) to secure a victory,
left the opposition camp aware that it needed to be united and to find issues
that would attract voters. The latter was difficult, given that Mongolia's
economy had undeniably performed well under the MPRP. Nonetheless, economic
success had not cured Mongolia's endemic poverty. Influential legislator H.
Gundalai thus suggested to place welfare benefits at the core of its campaign
strategy. Candidates nominated by the MDC coalition used speeches posters,
leaflets, and advertisements to publicize their intention to implement
far-reaching social welfare programs, such as increasing child benefits,
instituting housing development programs for about 40,000 families, providing
subsidies for English courses at schools, and more general improvements in
educational (MDC Platform).
The MPRP began its
campaign by condemning the MDC's plans as unfeasible, characterizing them as an
election gimmick, but later decided to focus its own campaign on social
welfare (MPRP Platform). The party's candidates promised a one-time subsidy of MNT 500,000 to
those families living below poverty line; another 100,000 to every family with
a newborn child; and the same amount annually to families with three or more
children. In addition, the MPRP pledged to set up a pension fund offering
subsidies to elderly people in need, and promised a housing program in the
capital, Ulan Bator, that would benefit 10,000 families.
After social
welfare, the economy was the most important issue, with extravagant promises
from both major parties. The MPRP offered a guaranteed annual growth rate of at
least 7 percent, and pledged to increase the productivity of the agricultural
industry, to double the exports from the mining industry, and to create 145,000
new jobs. MDC candidates spoke of a guaranteed economic growth rate between 6
and 10 percent, and promised a 5-year tax exemption for shepherds, a radical
reform of the tax system, and to encourage foreign companies to invest in
Mongolia's agriculture. In foreign policy, both major parties emphasized the
need for Mongolia to maintain its participation in UN peacekeeping operations.
The MPRP stated its aim to sign a free-trade agreement with the USA, while the
MDC promised closed political and economic ties with South Korea.[viii]
During the election
campaign, MPRP's candidates sought to represent themselves as responsible and experienced
politicians. The party received support from the General Secretary of the
Socialist International, who visited Mongolia in early June and participated in
the MPRP's campaigning. The leadership also worked especially hard at shrugging
off the party's communist past, and, on several occasions, party
representatives emphasized that the MPRP would no be a social democratic party modeled
on Tony Blair's 'New' Labour. The MDC, on the other hand, tried to run a united
and programmatic campaign, although their candidates were not above personal
attacks on their rivals. Despite the efforts of the opposition camp, few people
doubted an MPRP victory, especially following a rash of opinion polls in
mid-June. The MPRP continued to command around 50 percent of the vote, while
the MDC was credited with between 32 percent and 36 percent. No poll suggested
that the proportion of undecided voters exceeded 10 percent.[ix]
Election results
The initial election results astonished
the public and international observers. The MDC and MPRP captured 36 seats
each, the Republican Party one, and independents three. The MPRP lost half of
its seats from the previous election, whereas the coalition parties increased
its share from three to 36 seats (see Table 4). The ruling party, however, immediately filed
a complaint to the election commission about voting irregularities at two
polling stations in electoral district 59 (Ulan Bator) and at one polling
station in electoral district 24 (Uvurkhangai). The administrative court ruled
the election in both constituencies invalid, thus reducing MDC’s seat tally to
34. Legal wrangling was still continuing in December 2004, with neither seat yet filled.
There were a total
of 1,279,516 eligible voters in the remaining 74 constituencies. Voter turnout
averaged 82.2 percent, more or less unchanged from 2000. There were 15,234 invalid
votes. The MPRP won 49 percent of the vote, down around 8 percentage points on
the last election; the parties of the MDC gained 7 percentage points, winning
44 percent of the vote. Despite losing the disputed seats, and therefore
dropping slightly below seat parity with the MPRP, the MDC was the real winner
of this election. It benefited hugely from the unity it
had lacked in previous elections, and which had long been the hallmark of the
MPRP and its campaign. The MDC coalition also gained by its welfare plans,
which proved popular. Public opinion turned further against the MPRP in
reaction to the party’s fairly blatant abuse of its advantageous media position
during the campaign (Globe International, 2004).
Given the
capriciousness of MPs, and continuing uncertainty over the disputed seats,
there was little optimism that either the MDC or the MPRP could govern alone,
or in a slender majority coalition with the four other MPs, for four years. The
major parties therefore decided in September 2004 to form a grand coalition
government. The coalition government stipulates that the posts of Speaker and
Prime Minister be held for 2 years on rotation, and that cabinet posts be
shared equally among the two camps. A 4-year Action Plan was approved by the new
cabinet, which promises far-reaching changes in Mongolia's economy,
environmental, and political system. The economic measures focus on encouraging
small businesses, through deregulation and an expanded micro-credit system.
Environmental plans include the creation of a liability system for
environmental damage, and the promotion of environmentally friendly fuels. Most
notably, at least in this context, the Action Plan includes measures to limit
electoral corruption. National TV and radio stations are to be transformed into
independent public media outlets. And civil servants will be prohibited from
participating in campaigns, and from misusing budget resources, state property
or vehicles for campaign purposes. If the Action Plan is enacted, the next Mongolian
election should take place in a freer and fairer political environment.
Notes
[i] Mongolian National Democratic
Party (MNDP), Mongolian Religious Democratic Party (MRDP), Mongolian Socialist
Democratic Party (MSDP), Mongolian Democratic Renaissance Party (MDRP), and the
Mongolian Democratic Party (MDP).
[ii]
http://www.un-mongolia.mn/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=309
[iii]
General
Election Commission
[iv]
According to Freedom of the Press 2004, a global survey of media independence
carried out by Freedom House, Mongolia’s media is only partly free.
[v] Mongolian Medee, 3 June 2004.
[vi] Data provided by the Voter
Education Centre, Ulaanbaatar (June 2004).
[vii]
The survey was conducted by Fabrizio, McLaughin & Associates, Western Wats
Center and the Alternative Center for Contemporary Political Research. MPRP:
50%, MDC: 38 %, other: 2%, undecided: 10%
[viii] The party platforms
were published in their entirety in newspapers: MPRP’s in Unen on 17 May
2004; MDC’s in Mongolian Medee, issue 100-102.
[ix] These opinion polls
were conducted by Sant Maral, Prognose, and Universal.
References
Brick,
Andrew, Gastil Raymond, and William Kimberling, 1992. An Assessment of the
Great People’s Hural Mongolia. www.ifes.org/reg_activities/reports/execsum/mongjun92.htm.
7 June 2004.
Cheng, Kevin C., 2003. Growth and recovery in Mongolia during
transition. Working Paper 03/217, International Monetary Fund.
Freedom House, 2004. Freedom in the world. http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/
freeworld/2004/table2004.pdf. 1 June 2004.
Globe
International, 2004. Free and Fair: A report on research conducted among media
outlets and the electorate. Ulan Bator.
Mongolian Open Society Foundation,
2004. Report on the 2004 electoral campaign (in Mongolian). Ulan Bator.